In January 2018, H&M, a leading international fashion retailer, sparked a global controversy with its "Coolest Monkey in the Jungle" campaign (NYT, 2028). The advert, featuring a Black child wearing a hoodie with the slogan, was widely condemned as racially insensitive, perpetuating harmful stereotypes. The public backlash was swift and severe, with social media outrage, calls for boycotts, and celebrities cutting ties with the brand. Notably, artist The Weeknd, who had collaborated with H&M on a clothing line, publicly severed his partnership (BBC, 2018).
This case is an important example of how marketing can violate industry standards, specifically those governed by bodies like the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the UK, which oversees harmful and offensive advertising. It highlights how brands must be ethically conscious in their marketing strategies, particularly in portraying race and cultural issues (Amoah, 2020).
Porter’s ‘Five Forces’ (above image) analysis of H&M’s "Coolest Monkey in the Jungle" (see appendix 1.) campaign highlights the impact of marketing missteps in today’s competitive and socially conscious fashion industry. The immediate consumer backlash, amplified by social media, underscores the high bargaining power of buyers, who can readily influence a brand’s reputation (Porter, 2008). Additionally, high competitive rivalry allows competitors to differentiate themselves ethically, capitalising on H&M’s controversy to appeal to socially conscious consumers (Chopra, 2018). This case illustrates how brands must prioritise inclusivity to mitigate the threat of substitutes as consumers increasingly turn to more conscientious alternatives (Dangelico & Fraccascia, 2024).
Summary
The “Coolest Monkey in the Jungle” campaign underscores how critical it is for brands in the competitive fashion industry to maintain sensitivity to social issues. High buyer power, ease of substitution, and intense competition mean that H&M must address its marketing ethics and regain consumer trust to mitigate long-term impacts on its market position (Fisk, 2014).
PESTLE Analysis:
Political:
The controversy came in a politically charged climate where movements such as Black Lives Matter (BLM) had already elevated the global conversation about racial equality and systemic injustice. The H&M ad, lacking racial sensitivity, was seen as an affront to these ongoing efforts. It emphasised the need for political and social awareness in marketing campaigns, particularly as racial and cultural representation in the media became a highly scrutinised topic (Poole, 2020).
Economic:
H&M faced significant financial repercussions in the wake of the controversy. Calls for boycotts quickly spread on social media, especially in African markets, where consumers expressed anger at the brand’s failure to account for cultural sensitivities (Guardian News, 2018). H&M's share price dropped following the backlash, and in South Africa, protests even led to physical store closures (CNN, 2018). The brand’s failure to anticipate the financial risks of an insensitive campaign reflected poorly on its crisis management and economic foresight.
Social:
The social ramifications of this campaign were substantial. The ad perpetuated negative racial stereotypes, provoking global outrage. As consumers and activists voiced their dissatisfaction, the case highlighted brands' social responsibility in promoting equality and inclusivity (Akwei, 2018). The failure of H&M to foresee the offensive nature of the advert revealed a significant disconnect between the brand’s internal processes and the diverse consumer base it serves. (Fill, Chris, & Turnbull, 2019).
Technological:
Social media played a central role in amplifying the controversy. Platforms like Twitter and Instagram enabled the rapid spread of public criticism, much of which H&M had little control over. Hashtags such as #BoyCotHM gained traction, creating an online movement that pressured the company to respond swiftly. The technological impact of viral campaigns made it clear that brands are more vulnerable than ever to real-time public opinion, and mistakes can quickly escalate.
Legal:
While the ad did not violate any specific legal codes, it breached ethical guidelines set by regulatory bodies such as the ASA. The ASA's codes of conduct prohibit advertising that could cause widespread offense, particularly in the context of racial or cultural sensitivity (ASA, 2022). Though no legal action was taken, the incident demonstrated the need for stricter adherence to ethical principles in marketing.
Environmental:
Although environmental concerns were not directly linked to this campaign, H&M’s broader business model—based on fast fashion—has been criticized for its environmental impact. This case highlights the brand’s ongoing challenges in addressing corporate responsibility, both socially and environmentally. Moving forward, a more ethical and sustainable approach to both product and message might be essential to repair its reputation (Hunt, 2023).
Ethical Critique:
This campaign is a textbook example of ethical failure in marketing, particularly in racial sensitivity. From a deontological perspective, which emphasises adherence to moral rules and duties, H&M failed to ensure that their advertising respected basic principles of human dignity and inclusivity. The advert’s racially insensitive nature reflected poorly on the brand’s internal decision-making processes, raising questions about how diverse or informed H&M's creative and marketing teams were in their campaign development.
Fill, Chris, & Turnbull (2019), authors of ‘Marketing Communications’ discuss audience experience, highlighting no consideration was made by H&M’s marketing department and its failure to anticipate the reaction also points to a lack of cultural understanding within the organisation. Virtue ethics, which focuses on the development of moral character, would suggest that a more inclusive and diverse workforce could have helped prevent this kind of error. An ethically conscientious company should aim to promote virtue through its actions and messaging, ensuring respect, fairness, and equality across all platforms. H&M’s response, which included apologising and removing the offending ad, was reactive rather than proactive (WEF, 2021).
While H&M made amends by implementing diversity training and increasing diversity in its leadership roles, the damage was already done. The lesson here is that brands must take utilitarian principles into account, weighing the potential consequences of their marketing choices. In this case, the harm caused to H&M’s reputation, alongside the emotional harm felt by the public, far outweighed any short-term gains from the campaign (Gill, 2021).
Conclusion:
The "Coolest Monkey in the Jungle" campaign remains a case study of how brands can fail when they overlook the ethical implications of their marketing. H&M's lack of awareness regarding the cultural sensitivity of their ad not only damaged their reputation but also highlighted the need for greater accountability and inclusivity in the fashion industry. Brands must ensure their marketing messages align with societal values and ethical standards set by regulatory bodies like the ASA. The financial and reputational consequences of the campaign demonstrated the importance of ethical advertising, particularly in an age where consumers are more socially aware and vocal than ever before. To avoid similar controversies, brands must take proactive steps to integrate ethical considerations into every aspect of their advertising processes (ASA, 2022).
References:
Accenture (2018). From me to we: The rise of the purpose-led brand. Available at: The Power of Brand Purpose (accenture.com) (Accessed: 5 October 2024).
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) (2021). Diversity in Advertising: ASA Guidelines. Available at: https://www.asa.org.uk (Accessed: 5 October 2024).
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) (2022) Harm and Offence: ASA Code of Advertising Practice. Available at: ASA and CAP research: harm and offence - ASA | CAP (Accessed: 16 October 2024).
Akwei, I. (2018). H&M closes its shops in South Africa after protests over ‘coolest monkey’ hoodies. Face2Face Africa. Available at: H&M closes its shops in South Africa after protests over ‘coolest monkey’ hoodies - Face2Face Africa (Accessed 22nd October 2024)
Amoah, L. (2020). Lessons from failure: The ethical, and economic, opportunities in pursuing diversity. WARC. Available at: Lessons from failure: The ethical, and economic, opportunities in pursuing diversity | WARC (openathens.net) (Accessed: 22nd October 2024)
BBC (2018) H&M Apologises Over 'Racist' Image of Black Child in Hoodie. Available at: H&M apologises over 'racist' image of black boy in hoodie - BBC News (Accessed: 16 October 2024).
BBC (2024) Ethics - Introduction to ethics: Duty-based ethics. Available at: BBC - Ethics - Introduction to ethics: Duty-based ethics (Accessed: 1st November 2024)
Dangelico, R. & Fraccascia, L. (2024) Mapping sustainable options in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review and a future research agenda. Sustainable Development. Wiley Online Library. Available at: Mapping sustainable options in the
fashion industry: A systematic literature review and a future research agenda - Schiaroli - Sustainable Development - Wiley Online Library (Accessed: 30.10.2024)
Fill, Chris, and Turnbull. (2019). Marketing Communications: Touchpoints, Sharing and Disruption, Pearson Education, Limited. ProQuest Ebook Central. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/falmouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5801463. (Accessed 22nd October 2024)
Fisk P. ( 2014). Gamechangers: Creating Innovative Strategies for Business and Brands; New Approaches to Strategy, Innovation and Marketing. SMART SHOPPERS, SMART STORES pp 185-185. & THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT. pp 26-26. Publisher: Wiley & Sons
Hunt, T. (2023) Why shop ethically. Ethical Consumer. Available at: Why shop ethically? | Ethical Consumer (Accessed: 22nd October 2024)
Khamis, A. (2020) Diversity in Media: Impacts on Social Norms. Media & Society Journal, 12(3), pp. 123-135.
Metro (2021) Channel 4’s Black To Front: Countdown star Marverine Cole hopes takeover day proves ‘Black people aren’t a risk’. Available at: Black To Front: Countdown star insists ‘Black people aren’t a risk’ | Metro News (Accessed: 7 October 2024).
(NYT) New York Times (2018) H&M Closes Stores in South Africa Amid Protests Over ‘Monkey’ Shirt - The New York Times (nytimes.com) (Accessed: 22nd October 2024).
Poole, D. (2020) Racial representation in advertising: A snapshot. WARC. Available at: Racial representation in advertising: A snapshot | WARC (openathens.net) Accessed 22nd October 2024)
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78-93. Available at: The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy (Accessed: 30th October 2024)
Smith, R. (2021) 'Black to Front': Why Channel 4’s All-Black Day Matters. The Independent. Available at: Merkel urges western Balkans to focus on EU membership | The Independent (Accessed: 16 October 2024).
Smith, A., and Klein, T. (2020) The Need for Diverse Teams in Creative Industries. Marketing Week, 5(4), pp. 78-83.
(WEF) World Economic Forum. (2021). To help futureproof your business, keep these 4 steps in mind. Available at: To futureproof your business, keep these 4 steps in mind | World Economic Forum (Accessed: 24th October 2024)
Comments